Why More Companies Are Letting Their CMO Absorb the CRO Role
David Cyrus
Founder, Attainment
June 11, 2025
8 min read

AI Summary
The traditional separation between marketing and revenue leadership is breaking down. With RevOps and AI handling forecasting and analytics, the CMO is often best positioned to own revenue. This article explores why companies are consolidating GTM leadership under one role, and what it means for the future of marketing and sales alignment.
The Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) role emerged in the 2010s as companies sought to unify sales, marketing, and customer success under one leader. The promise: better alignment, faster growth, and clearer accountability.
But a decade later, many companies are rethinking this structure. Instead of hiring a CRO, they're expanding the CMO's mandate to include revenue ownership.
Why? Three reasons:
1. RevOps Has Absorbed the CRO's Technical Work
The CRO role was originally designed to own forecasting, pipeline management, and revenue analytics. But today, Revenue Operations (RevOps) teams handle these functions with sophisticated tools and automation.
RevOps owns the systems, data, and processes that drive predictable revenue. The CRO's traditional responsibilities—pipeline visibility, deal tracking, and revenue forecasting—are now table stakes, managed by specialized ops teams.
This leaves the CRO role focused on strategy and execution—areas where the CMO often has more expertise.
2. Marketing Drives the Majority of Revenue
In modern B2B companies, marketing generates 60-80% of pipeline. Product marketing defines positioning. Demand generation fills the funnel. Content marketing educates buyers. Customer marketing drives expansion.
Sales executes, but marketing creates the conditions for revenue. When the CMO already owns the majority of revenue-generating activities, it makes sense to give them full accountability.
3. One Leader, One Strategy, One Team
The biggest challenge in GTM is alignment. When marketing and sales report to different leaders, you get competing priorities, misaligned incentives, and finger-pointing when targets are missed.
By consolidating GTM under the CMO, companies create a unified strategy. Marketing and sales become one team, working toward the same goals, measured by the same metrics.
What This Means for CMOs
If you're a CMO, this shift is an opportunity—but it requires a mindset change. You're no longer just responsible for brand, demand, and content. You're accountable for revenue.
This means:
- Owning pipeline targets, not just MQLs
- Managing sales teams, not just marketing teams
- Forecasting revenue, not just campaign performance
- Building systems for predictable growth, not just creative campaigns
The CMOs who succeed in this expanded role are those who embrace systems thinking, data-driven decision-making, and cross-functional leadership.
The Bottom Line
The CRO role isn't disappearing—it's evolving. In many companies, the CMO is the natural owner of revenue because they already control the levers that drive growth.
The question isn't whether marketing should own revenue. It's whether your CMO is ready to lead it.
People Also Ask
Should every company have the CMO own revenue?
Not necessarily. This structure works best in companies where marketing drives the majority of pipeline and the CMO has strong operational and analytical skills. In sales-led organizations, a traditional CRO may still be the right choice.
What happens to the sales team when the CMO owns revenue?
Sales teams report to the CMO, often through a VP of Sales. The key is ensuring sales has a strong voice in strategy and that the CMO understands sales processes and challenges.
How do you measure success when the CMO owns revenue?
The CMO is measured on revenue targets, pipeline generation, customer acquisition cost, and customer lifetime value—not just marketing metrics like MQLs or brand awareness.