Michigan's statute reads all-party, but a court held participant recording is outside it. An AI vendor that records for a clinic could count as a third party, which is a risk to flag, not a holding.
Recording notice
Partly
AI disclosure
No
Dental regulator statement
No
This is a guide for clinic owners, not legal advice. Every line points to the law or the regulator's own page, checked on 2026-10-21. Where we could not confirm something, the page says so.
Michigan's eavesdropping statute (MCL 750.539c) uses the words without the consent of all parties. The Michigan Court of Appeals, in Sullivan v. Gray (1982), held that it unambiguously excludes participant recording. The same opinion says a participant apparently may not employ third parties to do so. A vendor that records on a clinic's behalf could therefore count as a third party. That is a risk to flag, not a holding.
We found no state law that requires a business or health provider to tell a caller, texter or patient they are dealing with an AI. This rests on secondary trackers and web searches, not on the legislature's own search, so it is a finding of none found and not proof that none exists.
We found no comprehensive consumer privacy law and no consumer health data law in force here. We checked secondary update lists, not the legislature's own search. A state medical records or professional confidentiality statute may also apply and was not searched. HIPAA still binds a covered clinic and its business associate vendor.
Michigan bars a telephone solicitation that consists in whole or in part of a recorded message. It covers solicitation only. The federal rules on AI-voice calls and texts apply as well.
We found no statement from the Michigan Board of Dentistry on AI agents. Our check was a web search, not a search of the board's own site, so this is not proof of absence.
We found no statement from the Michigan Board of Medicine on AI agents. Our check was a web search, not a search of the board's own site, so this is not proof of absence.
The federal rule applies here; nothing specific to this place was found.
The ADA requires a public accommodation to provide effective real-time communication, including text telephones and FCC-approved relay systems. A clinic phone line answered by an AI agent must still work for a relay caller.
Aida opens every call with the recording notice your province or state needs, and says it is the practice's AI agent wherever you want it to. Request a demo with your clinic's rules in mind.
Notice
in the opening line
Approved
answers only
Staff
keeps control